<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dump Scanner Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retailbandit.com/2006/07/dump-scanner-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retailbandit.com/2006/07/dump-scanner-law/</link>
	<description>When checkout isn&#039;t simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retail Bandit</title>
		<link>http://retailbandit.com/2006/07/dump-scanner-law/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Retail Bandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retailbandit.com/?p=13#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Dear Stephanie,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I really don&#039;t understand how someone could &quot;abuse&quot; the scanner law. It&#039;s pretty straight-forward. Either an item was priced correctly or it wasn&#039;t. Either the customer was overcharged or they weren&#039;t. There isn&#039;t much gray area there.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Personally, I wish more states had a scanner law -- or at least one that was written a little clearer than Michigan&#039;s law. It&#039;s a shame that customers are being ripped off millions of dollars each year and state legislators don&#039;t care enough to do anything about it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am curious to know where your information comes from though. Do you have inside information regarding the scanning law that our readers should know about? What is your source?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As far as upsetting me... not to worry, I&#039;m happy you posted your comments. This site isn&#039;t about me. It&#039;s about consumers getting a fair shake - as in - getting what they pay for.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for your comments. I look forwarding to hearing more about the abolition of the scanner law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stephanie,</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t understand how someone could &#8220;abuse&#8221; the scanner law. It&#8217;s pretty straight-forward. Either an item was priced correctly or it wasn&#8217;t. Either the customer was overcharged or they weren&#8217;t. There isn&#8217;t much gray area there.</p>
<p>Personally, I wish more states had a scanner law &#8212; or at least one that was written a little clearer than Michigan&#8217;s law. It&#8217;s a shame that customers are being ripped off millions of dollars each year and state legislators don&#8217;t care enough to do anything about it.</p>
<p>I am curious to know where your information comes from though. Do you have inside information regarding the scanning law that our readers should know about? What is your source?</p>
<p>As far as upsetting me&#8230; not to worry, I&#8217;m happy you posted your comments. This site isn&#8217;t about me. It&#8217;s about consumers getting a fair shake &#8211; as in &#8211; getting what they pay for.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. I look forwarding to hearing more about the abolition of the scanner law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

