Comments on: Target Loses Loyal Customer http://retailbandit.com/2008/05/target-loses-loyal-customer/ When checkout isn't simple Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:21:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Retail Bandit http://retailbandit.com/2008/05/target-loses-loyal-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-202 Retail Bandit Sun, 18 May 2008 11:56:08 +0000 http://retailbandit.com/?p=645#comment-202 Dear Rachel, You might take comfort in knowing that you may still have recourse of action. According to Michigan law... <strong>Pricing and Advertising of Consumer Items (Excerpt)</strong> <strong>Act 449 of 1976</strong> <strong>445.354 Charging more or less than price indicated; evidence of violation.</strong> <strong>Sec. 4.</strong> <em><strong>1.A</strong> person shall not knowingly charge or attempt to charge for a consumer item a retail sale price exceeding the price required to be indicated pursuant to section 3. It shall not be construed to be a violation of this act to charge for a consumer item a total price less than the price required to be indicated pursuant to section 3.</em> <em><strong>2. </strong>It shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this section if a price charged or attempted to be charged as a result of electronic identification or calculation by an automatic checkout system exceeds the price required to be indicated pursuant to section 3.</em> <a href="http://retailbandit.com/michigan-scanner-law/" rel="nofollow">Michigan Scanner Law</a> Dear Rachel,

You might take comfort in knowing that you may still have recourse of action. According to Michigan law…

Pricing and Advertising of Consumer Items (Excerpt)

Act 449 of 1976

445.354 Charging more or less than price indicated; evidence of violation.

Sec. 4.

1.A person shall not knowingly charge or attempt to charge for a consumer item a retail sale price exceeding the price required to be indicated pursuant to section 3. It shall not be construed to be a violation of this act to charge for a consumer item a total price less than the price required to be indicated pursuant to section 3.

2. It shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this section if a price charged or attempted to be charged as a result of electronic identification or calculation by an automatic checkout system exceeds the price required to be indicated pursuant to section 3.

Michigan Scanner Law

]]>